Merpati Jingga

Entries categorized as ‘Uncategorized’

Liberal Ideas

May 26, 2009 · 1 Comment

Liberalism, as the name implies, is the fundamental belief in a political ideal where individuals are free to pursue their own goals in their own ways provided they do not infringe on the equal liberty of others. But what are the basic principles of liberalism and liberal democracy exactly?

Human rights

Firstly, there is a commitment to fundamental human rights. Human rights are rights that the individual deserves to enjoy as a human being and member of a society. They protect the individual as well as the freedom and dignity of that individual. Respect for human rights is essential to social stability and peace while human rights abuses breed resentment, hatred and unrest.

Fundamental human rights, for example, are the right to human dignity, life, freedom from slavery, freedom of religion, freedom of belief, freedom of expression, freedom of association and so forth.

The right to freedom from slavery is an absolute right that cannot be limited. But what about freedom of expression? A famous example of a limitation here is that one cannot allow people to shout “fire” in a crowded theatre when there is no fire. Doing so would cause a panic and people would get hurt trying to get out. However, liberals are usually very much against limiting freedom of expression, or censorship, because it is often used by governments to suppress people and views that differ from what the government wants people to believe or say.

Equality

Of particular importance among the fundamental human rights is the right to equality. As with other fundamental rights, there is debate about what exactly equality means. All liberals will agree that equality means there can be no discrimination. In a court of law, for example, there can be no discrimination on the grounds of race (black or white) or gender (male or female) or religion (Christian or Muslim). There are still places where, for example, what a woman has to say in a court counts only half as much as what a man has to say. This is clearly unequal treatment.

But does equality also mean that everyone must get the same salary or live in the same kind of house? Liberals will say ‘no’, but will demand that all people must have the same opportunities to improve their lives – therefore liberals the emphasize to improving education for all. Liberals, in short, believe in equality before the law and equality of opportunity.

Rule of Law

Without the rule of law, constitutions and laws are meaningless. The most basic idea underlying the principle of rule of law is that law is supreme. It is law that rules and nothing else. In a liberal democratic society, law is made through the joint decision of democratically elected representatives of the people, not by the arbitrary decision of any single individual or group that happens to possess power.

As such rule of law imposes order. You can only be punished if you break the law. Law must apply equally to all (equality under the law). If it doesn’t, law itself is arbitrary – which would contradict the principle of rule of law. Rule of law also requires enforcement of the law.

Not just the citizens, but government, officials, lawmakers must abide by the law. A key aspect of rule of law is the limitation of power so that even a democratically elected official or leader cannot abuse his/her power without facing a possible prosecution or imprisonment. Rule of law ensures such limitation of power through a required separation of executive, legislative and judiciary powers. As a result, judicial independence is possible.

Beyond equal enforcement of the law, rule of law also protects minorities against discrimination and prevents preferential treatment for certain individuals or groups. When everyone is treated equally under the law, there cannot be any special favour or discrimination imposed through law.

Rule of law, also termed “government under law”, cannot exist in tyrannies or in totalitarian states because they do not allow equality under the law and judicial independence.

Individual freedom

The basis for these liberal beliefs is the importance liberals attach to the individual and his/her rights and responsibilities. Every single person is important. Liberals believe that people must decide for themselves and not be told what to do all the time. They must be free to lead the life they want to lead, provided that in doing so they do not limit someone else’s freedom. In other words, your right to swing your arms freely stops where you start hitting someone.

This belief in individual liberty underlies all the other principles listed already. In addition, liberalism demands tolerance of various opinions and, most difficult of all, of opinions that are different from our own. A famous writer once said: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

Private property

Liberals take the idea of individual freedom and individual rights also into the area of economics. In fact, historically speaking, the concept of property rights was the very basis of individual freedom and individual rights.

Firstly, there is the principle that people can own property. At its most basic, this means that each person owns him or herself and therefore cannot be owned by someone else, that is, no one can be a slave. Such a free person can own other property: clothes, books, furniture, land, houses, cars and even ideas, so-called intellectual property.

Secondly, owners of property must also be able to come together peacefully and sell their property and buy other people’s property freely. This is only possible in an economically free environment.

Economic Freedom

Economic freedom consists of a number of ingredients, the most important being personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to enter and compete in markets and protection of people and property from aggression by others.

With economic freedom, consumers can choose what they consider the best for themselves while individuals are free to set up businesses or engage in lawful international trade and companies are free to compete in a fair manner.

When people are free and free markets exist, everyone benefits. The overall effect is an increase in wealth and well-being. Empirical studies show that the wealthiest countries are countries with high levels of economic freedom while the poorest states are usually those with little or no economic freedom. They also show a positive correlation in which countries with higher levels of economic freedom enjoy higher employment rates.

Governments can reduce economic freedom through high taxation and regulation which narrow the scope for individual choice and voluntary exchange. They can also undermine economic freedom by limiting entry into certain occupations and business activities.

On the contrary, a state that pursues a liberal market policy that favours economic freedom will try to keep barriers to local and international trade such as duties and tariffs at the minimum or even at zero percent where appropriate. It also treats citizens equally when it comes to trade benefits and economic opportunities.

Eventually, economic freedom and market economy benefit not only traders and corporations but also consumers. In a free market environment, producers or suppliers have to compete on quality, price and service to win customers who have the freedom to choose from a wide variety of choice.

Governments can improve economic freedom by
• Establishing legal structures that provide for the even-handed enforcement of contracts and the protection of individuals and their property against violence, coercion and fraud.
• Allowing citizens access to sound money
• Refraining from activities that interfere with personal choice, voluntary exchange and the freedom of individuals and businesses to compete.

Economies with a high level of economic freedom are called market economies.

Liberal Democracy

Strictly speaking, democracy is not one of liberalism’s core values, but adding them up, liberal democracy becomes the only political system under which these values can really exist. The term is essentially the combination between liberalism and democracy. At the core of liberalism is individual freedom and protection of that freedom. Democracy alone simply means majority rule, which in practice can mean tyranny by a majority. As such, a majority could pass laws that puts ethic minorities at disadvantage.

In a liberal democracy, there are safeguards to protect minorities through a constitutional procedure and due democratic process. This means that when it comes to passing a bill, special provisions that exist for minorities must be considered. The majority cannot pass a law that benefist them but that will infringe on the rights of minorities. If they do, the latter can, for instance, appeal to the constitutional court.

A liberal democracy observes the rule of law, which limits the power of the state and ensures judicial independence. It employs a system of constitutional checks and balances to enable public scrutiny of government actions and to ensure that a government does not have absolute power to do whatever it pleases.

A liberal democracy prizes pluralism and tolerance. It sees dissent and disagreement as being normal and even as something positive. A majority might be right or wrong. If it is wrong, it is the process of open discussion and debate between people of different convictions and opinions that can put things right. Without discussion, there is no way to find out what people want and what better solutions there might be.

Categories: Uncategorized

SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON RIGHT TO EDUCATION ENDS VISIT TO MALAYSIA

May 24, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Attached is a copy of the report of the Special Rapportuer on the Right to Education in Malaysia, dated 29 March 2009, based on a visit from 5-13 February 2007.

The Special Rapporteur on the right to education, Vernor Muñoz Villalobos, issued the following statement on 13 February 2007:

“Vernor Muñoz Villalobos in his capacity as Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education, carried out an official visit in Malaysia from 5 to 14 February 2007. He visited Kuala Lumpur, Kota Bharu (Kelantan), Kuching (Sarawak) and in 40 different meetings he interacted with over 150 persons, from Government officials to teachers, students, parents, Trade Union representatives and civil society groups. The Special Rapporteur expresses his thanks to the Government for this opportunity to meet with the relevant public authorities. He regrets, however, not having had the occasion to meet either the Minister of Education or the Minister of Higher Education.

“The Special Rapporteur notes the Government’s important investment in education in support of economic growth and development and welcomes its proclaimed goal to achieve a “world class” education. However, he believes that there is a need to strengthen educational institutions which will permit the mainstreaming of human rights in all aspects of national life. This would facilitate the building of a citizenship model which is committed to the understanding and the realisation of human rights. In order to reach this goal, the Special Rapporteur encourages the adoption of an overall human rights approach. To that end the Special Rapporteur recommends that the Government ratify the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. He also recommends that national legislation be modified in order to comply with international standards. For example, the Special Rapporteur notes with concern that the “Universities and Colleges Act – 1971″ in its articles 15 and 16, curtails the right to freedom of association and expression and other civil and political rights of University students, and believes that the Government should consider repealing these provisions.

“Since the educational policies promote ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity, there should be an implementation of policies geared to generating equal opportunities across the board for the different groups which make up the population: Bumiputera, Chinese and Indians. For example, it has been reported by NGOs that there are disparities in the number of state schools for the Chinese population, despite the fact that this population has increased significantly in the last decades.

“The Indigenous Populations constitute another section which encounters difficulties in the realization of its right to education. The Iban community for example, suffers from extremely high drop-out rates. These populations are unable to compete successfully for access to higher education and the education centres provided for them are inadequate in number and quality. The indigenous cultures embody part of the heritage of the nation; the Government should therefore develop culturally sensitive educational programmes designed to preserve the history, languages and traditions of these peoples. To reach these goals, the Special Rapporteur recommends the establishment of a body within the Ministry of Education which would be responsible for attending to the educational needs of the indigenous peoples.

“The Special Rapporteur was briefed on the recent educational policy whereby Mathematics and Science are taught in English. Though the introduction of a foreign language represents a positive initiative, he was also informed that students and teachers alike in the rural areas are struggling because their mastery of the language is not sufficient. The cognitive development of students is thereby jeopardized. Several teachers expressed despair at not being able to meet the expectations of the Government. The Special Rapporteur therefore recommends that the competent authorities assess the implementation of that policy in order to take action to support adequately this way of teaching.

“For many years, Malaysia has been a destination country for migration and has openly welcomed migrants in its midst. However, thousands of undocumented children of foreign origin are not able to enjoy their human right to education. The Right to Education is one of the human rights that the Government of Malaysia committed itself to when it signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child, so the Rapporteur would recommend that it adopts measures to ensure this right to these children, whatever their legal status.

“As far as school life is concerned, the Rapporteur learned from the students and the teachers themselves that corporal punishment in schools remains a current practice. This disciplinary measure is expressly prohibited by the Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Ministry of Education should therefore strengthen its efforts to eradicate it. In addition, the Special Rapporteur was informed that students are not involved in the decision making process on matters that concern them, as stipulated by the Convention.

“Malaysia has almost achieved gender parity in the enrolment of its students. However, the Special Rapporteur notes that it must improve its educational policies regarding the rights of the girl child, adolescents and women, through affirmative action designed to have a more decisive impact the labour market and economic life of the nation. In order to achieve this, the Special Rapporteur recommends to include gender studies and human rights education in the curricula of the teacher training courses. It would also be desirable to include a human rights perspective in the “Blue Print” the educational programme for the coming years, as part of the efforts in reducing the gap between rural and urban areas. Malaysia would therefore need to withdraw the reservations it has made to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

“The Special Rapporteur believes that the Government must urgently develop and use qualitative and quantitative indicators, disaggregated according to gender, age, ethnic group, disabilities, and collect data in developing educational programmes which can enable every person to enjoy his or her rights.

“The Special Rapporteur firmly believes that Malaysia has the resources to respond creatively and comprehensively to all the challenges it faces. He considers that the rich diversity of its population is one of the main assets it possesses to generate good educational practices, and that its historical tradition, its vision of the future and the wealth of its diverse cultures can enable it to become a pivotal link between the East and the West which will contribute to regional development and to understanding between peoples”.

Categories: Uncategorized

Short film Training titled Ampang Speaks Through Video Clip

May 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Poster 1
The Youth and Sport Committee of the Selangor Govenment together with the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Liberty invite you to attend short film training titled “Ampang Speaks Through Video Clip”.
The main objective is to engage young people to develop skill for citizen journalism and to get involved and understand their own community. Participants will have a chance to report and express their views such as “how people struggling for their life”, ‘the teenager voice in Ampang”.

The workshop is designed for 3 days over 3 weekends which will be from 11am to 5pm on 7, 14 and 21 June 2009. Participants must bring their own handphone, digital camera or home video camera and laptops. Desktops will be provided for those without laptops but have access to desktops at home or office.

We expect around 30 participants to attend the workshop. Each participant will come up with a video clip of not more than 5-7 minutes. Those video clips will be shown at the premier screening in Ampang on 18 July 2009 at 8pm.

Agenda for the workshop is as follows.

DAY 1: Pre-production
-Objective
-target audience
-budget
-research
-script/treatment
-production schedule/timeline
-interviewees/actors
-locations
-equipments
-crew: producer, director, cameraperson/DOP, Sound, Light, Art Director, Gaffer, AD, PM, PA

Summary: Find out what stories you want to tell, why and to who. Bring back a story to work on next week.

DAY 2: Production
-Composition of shots/mise-en-scene
-Sound
-lighting

Summary: How to use your handphone/ digital camera/ home camera to shoot for best effect for the story’s purpose.

DAY 3: Post- production
Editing- offline, online
Sound mix
Special Effects
Subtitling
Distribution – film screenings, dvd, online.

Summary: How to convert what you shoot to something that can be edited in the computer, how to edit, export and upload it online.

Categories: Uncategorized

Liberalisation of 27 Services Sub-Sectors – Hardly Anything Impressive

April 24, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I was interviewed by Astro Awani yesterday on the government’s decision to liberalise 27 sub-sectors in the services sector. These sub-sectors covered health and social services, tourism services, transport services, business services and computer and related services. For full details of the sub-sectors, visit here.
(more…)

Categories: Uncategorized

Paul Krugman Flunks Capital Theory

April 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

By Sheldon Richman

Nobel laureate and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman is said to have bested commentator George Will over what prolonged the Great Depression during a joint appearance on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” back in November. But all Krugman really did was show that he, as a Keynesian, holds an unrealistic Play-Doh model of capital, as opposed to the more realistic heterogeneous, multistage, intertemporal structure-of-production model of the Austrian school of economics.

Here’s what actually happened. During the roundtable segment of the show, Will said, “[O]ne of the ways we turned a depression into the Great Depression . . .
was that there were no rules and investors went on strike because the government was completely improvising. Net investment was negative through almost all of the ’30s because, again, people did not know the environment in which they were operating because the government had the fidgets and would not let rules and markets work.”

Krugman responded, “Well, it’s not the way I read the history. . . . No, the negative net investment was because, you know, when you have 20 percent unemployment and all the factories are standing idle, who wants to build a new one? You don’t need to invoke the government to explain that.”

Point Krugman? Wrong.

If Krugman took the Mises-Hayek capital and trade-cycle theory seriously he’d realize that the idle factories in the 1930s represented malinvestment induced by Federal Reserve credit expansion in the 1920s. By lowering the interest rate and falsely signaling an increase in saving (that is, a preference for future over present goods), this policy shifted resources from later stages of production (closer to the consumer) to earlier stages of production. Unfortunately, those who think of capital as a heap of uniform, monochrome Play-Doh aren’t sensitive to this point. Capital is capital is capital. That’s why Krugman can’t understand why someone would want to invest in new facilities when others stand idle.

When the 1920s inflationary boom ended, as it had to because it was artificially induced and there weren’t enough resources for both the early stages and the later stages (where consumers wanted them), the malinvestments had to be liquidated and scarce resources had to be redeployed. But since capital consists not of malleable Play-Doh but rather of discrete things—buildings, machines, tools, materials—with particular characteristics, many of these products of malinvestment were unsuitable for other purposes. They couldn’t simply, costlessly, and instantly be moved and employed in later stages of production. Hence the idle factories. This was wasted capital brought about by the credit expansion. This was the Depression.

If the economy was to recover, new investment consistent with consumers’ actual preferences had to be undertaken. But that required time and saving—that is, deferred consumption, not the pumped-up consumer spending Krugman favors. It also required a stable political environment in which investors could be confident their property was safe from government predation. Unfortunately, thanks to tax increases, an unending stream of interventionist programs, and threatening antibusiness rhetoric, FDR’s government failed to provide that environment.

Krugman’s flip remark to Will is thus a perfect illustration of what is wrong with Keynesian economics. P.S. Will and Krugman believe it took World War II—“an enormous public works program,” in Krugman’s words—to end the depression. Both are wrong about that, as Robert Higgs documents in Depression, War, and Cold War. Ending unemployment with a military draft and boosting GNP through military contracts do not a recovery make. Living standards could hardly rise amid ration books, consumer-goods shortages, and war production.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

ADVERTORIAL

April 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

mainimg_tioman

BERJAYA TIOMAN BEACH, GOLF & SPA RESORT
(Contact FAISAL by emailing him at faisal.mustaffa@gmail.com)

FREE & EASY – 2 DAYS / 1 NIGHT PACKAGE

CHALET W/DAY W/END
TWIN TRIPLE TWIN TRIPLE
Standard 248/- 268/-
Superior 260/- 238/- 288/- 258/-
Deluxe 320/- 278/- 350/- 298/-
CHILD(2-12) 85/- 85/-

Package Includes : One Night Accommodation
Buffet Breakfast
2 Ways Ferry Transfer

OPTIONAL :HOLIDAYS SURCHARGE @ RM60/-per person is applicable
On Eve & Public Holidays.(30/4, 01/5, 08/5, 09/5, 05/6, 06/6)

3 DAYS / 2 NIGHTS PACKAGE (Minimum 4 Pax)

CHALET W/DAY W/END
TWIN TRIPLE TWIN TRIPLE
Standard 530/- 560/-
Superior 560/- 520/- 620/- 550/-
Deluxe 680/- 590/- 740/- 630/-
CHILD(2-12) 200/-* 200/-*

Package Includes : Two Nights Accommodation
5 Meals ( 2 buffet breakfast, 1 lunch & 2 dinner)
Lunch & Dinner at Sarang Restaurant-TEKEK
2 Ways Ferry Transfer

Chargeble Activities : Snorkelling Trip @ RM30/=p/pax (Includes gears)

OPTIONAL :HOLIDAYS SURCHARGE @ RM120/-per person is applicable
On Eve & Public Holidays.(30/4, 01/5, 08/5, 09/5, 05/6, 06/6)

** VALID TILL 30th June 2009

BERJAYA TIOMAN BEACH, GOLF & SPA RESORT
(Contact FAISAL by emailing him at faisal.mustaffa@gmail.com)

FREE & EASY – 2 DAYS / 1 NIGHT PACKAGE

CHALET W/DAY W/END
TWIN TRIPLE TWIN TRIPLE
Standard 248/- 268/-
Superior 260/- 238/- 288/- 258/-
Deluxe 320/- 278/- 350/- 298/-
CHILD(2-12) 85/- 85/-

Package Includes : One Night Accommodation
Buffet Breakfast
2 Ways Ferry Transfer

OPTIONAL :HOLIDAYS SURCHARGE @ RM60/-per person is applicable
On Eve & Public Holidays.(30/4, 01/5, 08/5, 09/5, 05/6, 06/6)

3 DAYS / 2 NIGHTS PACKAGE

CHALET W/DAY W/END
TWIN TRIPLE TWIN TRIPLE
Standard 420/- 450/-
Superior 450/- 410/- 510/- 440/-
Deluxe 570/- 480/- 630/- 520/-
CHILD(2-12) 140/- 140/-

Package Includes : Two Nights Accommodation
2 buffet breakfast
2 Ways Ferry Transfer

Chargeble Activities : Snorkelling Trip @ RM30/=p/pax (Includes gears)

OPTIONAL :HOLIDAYS SURCHARGE @ RM120/-per person is applicable
On Eve & Public Holidays.(30/4, 01/5, 08/5, 09/5, 05/6, 06/6)

** VALID TILL 30th June 2009

Categories: Uncategorized

Zulkifli moves to amend Federal Constitution

March 23, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Darussalam mosque

Darussalam mosque


By Shanon Shah (shanonshah@thenutgraph.com)

PETALING JAYA, 23 March 2009: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Member of Parliament (MP) Zulkifli Noordin has tried to move four motions in Parliament to amend the Federal Constitution regarding the status of Islam.
(more…)

Categories: Uncategorized

DTP’s 2009 Human Rights and Business Program

March 12, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Diplomacy Training Program (DTP) is calling for applications for its 2009 Human Rights Advocacy and Business Capacity Building Program for advocates to be held in Bangalore, India from 13-20 July. The program aims to assist non-government and community advocates from Asia-Pacific countries and Indigenous Australia to respond practically to the challenges for human rights posed by the growing power and influence of corporations. Participants will explore how emerging human rights standards and codes of conduct relevant to corporations can be applied in practice by developing practical skills for holding business accountable to its human rights responsibilities, including research skills, lobbying and working with the media.  The program will include a focus on the work of the UN SRSG on Human Rights and Business.
(more…)

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged:

Media, Democracy and Human Rights

March 4, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Media Awareness Workshop:

Media, Democracy and Human Rights

Sunway Hotel, George Town , Penang

Saturday,7th March 2009 from 8.30am -5.30pm,

sponsored by the Canadian High Commission.

(more…)

Categories: Uncategorized

Pameran “Mimpi Pasca Gotik”

March 4, 2009 · 2 Comments

mimpi pasca gothik

mimpi pasca gothik

Opening / Pembukaan:

On Saturday, 7 March 2009 at 3.00pm
Pada hari Sabtu, 7 Mac 2009, jam 3.00 petang

The exhibition runs from 7 March – 26 March 2009.
Pameran berlangsung dari 7 Mac – 26 Mac 2009.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: